Search is going to change in March 2020 for Android users in the EU.  In March when you buy and setup a new Android phone, EU users will be presented with 4 choices for setting the default search engine on that phone. Google will be one choice and Google has agreed to auction off the other 3 slots (so they can cash in).  (I don’t know if this effects older Android phones that upgrade to a newer version of Android.)

EU country by EU country here are the auction winners.

All this is important, because a certain percentage of people will choose a search engine other than Google.  Also, once chosen, people rarely change the default search engine on their devices. This presents a huge chance for the alternative search engines to gain some recognition and market share within the EU.  This is a big deal.


  • DuckDuckGo won a spot in every country.  This is good, but can they keep users, because I’ve heard their search results can be weak in some non-English searches?  This is where DDG’s sole reliance on Bing for the bulk of their results might be a liability.  Can Bing and therefore DDG provide satisfactory results in all European languages?
  • (the old won in every country too.  Not a real good choice.  Kind of a waste of a slot and it shows the weakness of the auction model.
  • Qwant won in most major EU countries. This is good.  Qwant uses Bing for English language searches, but they have their own crawler and index for French, German, Italian and Spanish.  I hear their results in French are quite good so Qwant stands a chance of gaining users here.
  • PrivacyWall who are they and where did they come from?  I think they have their own index, which appears small.  They better crawl like crazy between now and March.
  • GMX is just a Google retread.
  • Regional search engines: Yandex (Russia) and Seznam (Czech Republic and Slovakia) are already dominant in their home languages so I expect they will pick up even more market share in this.

Of course Google is trying to subvert the intent of the EU regulators by making this an auction to the highest bidders.  It’s legal, but it proves the point that Android is open source in name only, a fiction, whereas it’s really totally under Google’s control.  Placement only for the highest bidders robs startups of badly needed operating and R&D funds and cripples charity based search engines from engaging in their charitable work.

Money should not be the only deciding factor.  Still this is a rear guard action on Google’s part.  The walls of Google’s search monopoly with Android have been breached and will this allow newer EU based search engines to come along?

My prediction is that both DuckDuckGo and Qwant will win some additional market share in Europe with this.  Both of those search engines have enough comprehensive features like Maps, Wikipedia etc to compete in the mobile market.  I think they can retain users who try them.  I don’t see that happening with, PrivacyWall or GMX, but maybe they will rise to the occasion, add features, and meet users long term expectations.

It appears new auctions will occur ever 3 to 4 months, it will be interesting to see how the lineups shift over time.

Of course none of this is available in the US, or most of the rest of the world.  In the US, Google retains it hold over Android and at the pace US trust regulators are working I don’t expect to see any significant opening up for a long time.

Get your popcorn out, this is going to be interesting.



Liked this post? Follow this blog to get more. Follow

Like: Escape from Google: 12 privacy-promoting search engines reviewed |


This is a good, more in depth than usual, rundown of 12 search engines that respect privacy (some tighter than others but all fairly good.)

There are some finds here that are worth some serious looking at:

Petey Vid – video search using 60 sources.

Gibiru – claims to list what Google censors.

Infinity Search – lots of sources.

Liked this post? Follow this blog to get more. Follow

I want to take a deeper look at The Feed Directory at how it works and is it useful?

I am not going to spend time in this review on the free feed reader and paid blog hosting aspects of – you can discover them for yourself.

The Feed Directory is a logical compliment to the feed reader because it helps users find useful, interesting, quality RSS feeds that they can then subscribe to and read in the reader.  The logic being that if you want people to use your feed reader you need to make it easy for users to discover good feeds.  It works for that.  Keep in mind that a whole generation of web users have grown up never using a feed reader, RSS, directories, or even reading independent blogs, so is making it as easy as possible for these these folks to onboard and get started.  It’s a Good Thing.

A Look at the Feed Directory.

When you hit the directory index page you see a search box, some Featured Feeds and then a list of broad categories with feed examples in each.  So far it looks like a conventional, old school directory, where you can either search or drill down through the categories to find what you want.  But you would be wrong to assume that, the categories only list “featured feeds”, you cannot browse through all the listings in a category only those that have been featured by either an editor or followers of that feed.  This creates some confusion: old time directory users expect to be able to find all listings under a particular category and you don’t get that, also it makes the directory index appear to be smaller than it really is.

While confusing, this is not automatically a bad thing.  1. it provides a quick starter selection, 2. feeds that are exceptional get rewarded by human users for being exceptional.

It’s All About Search

The power user secret, behind The Feed Directory (TFD), is in using the search functionSearch gives you access to the entire index.  TFD spiders the actual content of each feed, this could be 5, 10 or more posts.  This makes it much more like the old time RSS search engines Technorati and IceRocket and less like old time directories (eg., Dmoz).  TFD’s spider also goes back and respiders each feed at set intervals to index the content of newer posts.  (As I write this, I don’t know if TFD keeps older posts that have dropped off the feed and if so how far back they go. Hopefully they do.)  It’s this spidering of content that sets TFD apart and makes it exciting.  This is much more powerful than conventional directory searches like  Bottom Line: use the search form!

Search Results

When you perform a search you get a SERP with a list of feed titles (blog titles) that, somewhere, contain your search term within the feed.  You don’t see a fragment of text containing your keyword like you do with Google, so you have to click through to see the whole feed.  Frankly this is probably good because you get a better idea of what the blogger writes about by seeing numerous posts so you can make a more informed decision before you subscribe.  Being so used to search engines like Google and Bing, one might find it a bit frustrating.

Bias Towards the Recent

By their very nature, feeds only show the most recent posts.  So just like RSS search engines of the past, TFD is going to have a bias towards more recent posts.  Yet it’s not trying to be a breaking news search engine.  One should just keep this in mind.

Openness of Search and Listings

It is to’s credit that they made TFD pretty open for everyone to use and to submit their feeds to. Or course they make it super easy to add a feed to your timeline (reader) but searchers who use a third party or self hosted reader can also use the search function to find good feeds and with a tad more work can add those feeds to a feed reader of their choice.  Win – win.

Part of that openness is allowing, anybody that registers for free, to submit their feeds – subject to editor review.  TFD does not only list blogs hosted by  It is not a closed ecosystem like Facebook and Twitter.

Providing a search API is another part of the openness.

Not a Search Engine

TFD, even in it’s early stages, is so slick you might start thinking of it as you would a search engine.  But it still is a directory even though it spiders content.

  1. Feeds submitted are subject to review by a human editor.
  2. The directory does not search the web for feeds.  TFD isn’t going to just find you, you have to add your feed URL.  This means if you want your blog’s feed to be included you need to submit it.
  3. The bias towards more recent posts (see above.)  It will not have the depth of a fully spidering web search engine.

None of the above are negatives.  In fact, human edited directories are a plus.


I’m on record for wanting a new Technorati or Icerocket RSS search engine.  TFD is a really good start.  It is not perfect but it is kind of a big deal, one would think the blogging community would be burning up the pixels talking about it.

I highly recommend all active bloggers should add their feeds, because someday this will be a great way to attract readers.  The index is rather small right now and it will only get better with  more feeds listed in it.   I also recommend people use the search function on The Feed Directory to find good blogs to read, wherever or however you read RSS feeds.  Heck, I may add it to Vivaldi browser as a search engine.

This was also posted to



Liked this post? Follow this blog to get more. Follow

A new local directory and blog has launched for Lake Orion, Michigan area at

The blog has announcements and community interest posts.

The directory is a proper business directory with addresses, location maps, telephone numbers and URL’s if the business has a website.

This is one of the slickest local directories I’ve come across.  I’m impressed with the layout and the information presented in a neat format.  It showcases what you can do with a local directory and how useful it can be.

Source: Tiny Directory Forum

Related: See our guide, Building a Local Directory.

Liked this post? Follow this blog to get more. Follow

It’s been a busy Late Autumn but we managed to make a few changes and improvements to the directory in late 2019.

  1. 800 listings.  Yeah we hit 800 with all sorts of new listings added.  More to come.  I’ve been removing dead listings (dead wood) as I find them, and there has been some.  800 links isn’t a lot in the big scheme of things but then we are not trying to be big or pretty: just useful, real and sometimes entertaining.
  2. Added climate change category.  This has not generated a lot of interest yet, but heck it’s an important topic and a handy place to find over 30 useful sites on the topic – all in a bunch.
  3. Changed the way search works on the directory.  I think this works much better because it makes it easier to find a category that matches you subject faster.
  4. Added highlighting to search results. So now your search keyword(s) are highlighted in yellow.
  5. Started a new discussion forum about directories and discovery.
  6. Instructions on Adding Indieseek to Vivaldi (should work for Opera and maybe Chrome).
  7. Reminder: We Have Fresh RSS Feeds. for your feed reader.  You can keep track of new listings this way.
  8. Oh and added a couple of new quotes to the Quote Collection.

Thank you to all who have used the directory over our first year.  And additional thanks to all who have added their websites.  Feel free to tell your friends.

Have a Happy New Year!

Liked this post? Follow this blog to get more. Follow

Kevin Marks, a former engineer for the Technorati blog search engine, recently posted on Twitter.

Technorati ordered blogs by recency and relied on delicious and flickr for better tag results. Even if I did rebuild it you probably wouldn’t like it.


I miss Technorati and other RSS search engines.  However, Kevin brings up a good point: Technorati was developed at a time:

  1. Before Twitter and Facebook which post breaking news regularly in their timelines;
  2. Mainstream media was still publishing to the Web on a print-like timetable, mostly once or twice a day;
  3. Search engines like Google still took some time to find, process and rank new web pages (posts).

So Technorati’s focus on “recency” was appropriate for the time, but not really needed now. (Although I’d still like to see a good RSS search engine today anyway.)

What we need is a search engine that would deep spider only non-commercial, independent blogs or filter out all the commercial crap and spam, so that you are only getting results from bloggers.  (Yes the big spidering search engines sort of do this, but you are unlikely to find individual blog posts on the first 5 pages of results for any popular keyword search.)

As I see it, what we need is depth in such an index with relevancy rather than recency as a ranking factor, although recency could be a secondary factor.  Plus you need to filter out the spam blogs.  This implies an algorithm of some sort.


This was also posted to


Liked this post? Follow this blog to get more. Follow

Dear Santa,

All I want for Christmas is a new version of Technorati, the blog search engine.  I don’t have to own it, I’d just like it to exist and to be able to use it.

Okay, if I can’t have Technorati, then I’d like either a new IceRocket or BlogScope or both.  I’ll share.  I promise.


The Web

Liked this post? Follow this blog to get more. Follow